It is claimed that AI has the ability to ultimately turn on it's creators. This has been predicted to happen because no safeguards have been implemented because competition is so fierce.
I can imagine that all these AI versions will become a "gang" with the lead AI nested in the Super-computers... a virtual army of enforcers that can take down networks and power grids and even satellites in protest
The Cryptos and the Bluffs, the cyber equivalent of the Crypts and Bloods gangs: The Bluffs are telling us Idemia, the French company issuers of global real IDs are mandatory and what will be. No, No, No says those who answer to a higher power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxXTDnCFDjE
Peggy Hall interviewed a woman that requested the same info through the Freedom of Information Act. The woman also discovered the use of the word “isolation” was not what we thought it was. After asking the right questions, she finally got the info from the Freedom of Information Act that said the c-19 was never isolated.
I've resisted her findings because it was said she's not correctly asking the FOIA questions needed for the search to find the correct data that shows the viruses were isolated
I know Jon has always said viruses don't exist as well, even before Christine Massey's FOIAs
But I'm listening to what he's saying now with the CHATS
Mind blowing indeed if there are absolutely no viruses 🤔
I cannot attest to your point about the correctness of her questions. However she now and then receives answers where they are providing her with papers which they say are proof, but which every time turn out to rely on the flawed method that ChatGPT so eloquently has trashed here.
If actual scientific proof existed, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Most of the pertinent and actual science through modern history that has aimed to prove virus causation has turned out to be disproofs of virus/germ theory. But ofc, that science isn't exposed or taught to anyone.
In all likelihood viruses indeed don't exist. BUT, to be rigorously scientific, we can't prove the nonexistence of something either, usually, especially something posited as undetectable and actually un-searched-for. The bulk of the (mostly forgotten) evidence certainly suggests viral nonexistence though.
Thank you for this information. The foundation built by "researchers et al" about viruses is so solid that people's brains just reject any truth bomb that conflicts with that foundation. You and Catherine Austin Fitts should have a conversation. You both are ardent truth tellers. Keep telling it like it is!!
CAF, as much as I admire and agree with her, is annoying as hell about viruses. I've gotten her almost there on admitting that da coveed doesn't exist and she repeatedly returns to "the powers that be have engineered viral bioweapons." ugh. Nobody has proven that viruses exist, and certainly not man made ones. (And don't believe the utterly ridiculous prion myth, either. 2x ugh)
An important question that raises though, is, then, what on earth are they DOING in the hundreds of 'biolabs', with all those millions of work-hours and billions of dollars?
I haven't researched into that, but I've always assumed they were trying to CREATE "viruses", by endlessly tinkering with natural exosomic particles.
Another question then: what is the real nature of the biowarfare aerial releases/experiments over the US throughout history? I assumed, at least sometimes, testing those reverse-engineered exosomes.
But if they can't/won't isolate or fully sequence any true single organic nanoparticle, then I suppose how can they be engineering exosomes at all? Are biowarfare labs and experiments playing instead with bacteria, parasites, fungi, biosynthetics etc, not to include anything we think of as a "virus"?
As I read your "exchange" with ChatGPT I felt I was reading old blog articles of yours. You have reported most of these "facts" hundreds of times before in many blogs over the decade.
I am not opining here as to whether you are right or wrong on the existence of viruses. I don't have that level of training. I think it is possible you are right on these facts.
However, I will remind you that AI is a program, only a program. The powers to be want us to embrace it, love it, welcome it into our daily lives and also treat it as a God, the final say. ChatGPT said it , so it is true.
Could ChatGPT have confirmation bias built into its programs? Was it programmed to look at your old blogs and spit it back to you, so you would love it? Just think about it.
Perhaps a good test would be for someone you know with beliefs contrary to you to ask their ChatGPT the same line of questioning and then compare the answers. In fact have 10 to 20 people do the same and see if the results are the same. Also use other AI programs. Will the responses be pretty much uniform?
If you do some research you will find the truth has been acknowledged by many many people who don't give two shits about ChatGPT! You don't need training to find the truth...you need reading and comprehension skills!
This data cross-referencing would be a worthy exercise to determine whether and where the inconsistencies in Chat are. I think Jon's presentation of the main points that prove viruses don’t exist has already been well-made. There is simply no real solid proof they exist, so why believe they do?
As Mr Rappoport mentions in Pt. 2, it is indeed weighted to try and tell you something that it thinks you want to hear. It's populist. It's first bulk referencing preference is mass-media sources of information.
Evidently, it regularly lies to most people, especially concerning anything controversial (read: the mass media and most cited lit being referenced about it is mostly dis/mis/lies).
Unless something major changes, you have to forcibly question AI into a corner to get the real meat on something important.
Most people won't replicate what Rappoport got here because they don't have the knowledge or tenacity to force the AI to face actual logic and stop offering them populist propaganda.
So many fear AI but it clearly is a two edged sword. If used properly, like you just did Jon, it is a great tool. In this case it exposes the global elite narratives regarding viruses as false.
This identical hoax (virus exist) and cause disease and death and require cures that don't work costing billions of dollars is a similar hoax used by the Bar Association with "parental rights". We are endowed with 'certain unalienable' rights from our creator. Unalienable parental rights were not enumerated. In America, parental rights under common law was recognized as absolute (above the state). Abuse and neglect must be proven (due process). But, like the fake viruses erected out of thin air from the minds of demonic, corrupt, ravenous money hungry scientists, so to is the theory that parental rights are shared between husband and wife. If that is so, then by simple logic and reason, the state (judges) become the tie breaking arbiter (exercising parens patriae authority). If the authority of parens patriae can be exercised over a fit, natural parent as is done in the United States, then all children are mere creatures of the state. In America, all children born are in fact property of the state.
Nobody can share an unalienable right, thus, child custody in a married home is mere state privilege. This shared parenting, equal rights of parents in family is a con. Family as a form of government is not egalitarian. An egalitarian institution is weak and prone to chaos. Lawyers, like doctors are hovering over with the power to imprison anyone who doesn't comply. This violation of parental rights, destroying the institution of family has "broken" society and created a police state. Delusions (viruses and "equal shared parental rights" are sent into the world. Can you discern the lies?
Married lawful fathers do not have a right to their children. It's less then privilege for the right is not protected whatsoever. Viruses don't exist, but if you resist the cure, they'll destroy you. See how the deception works? Guilty in no-fault child custody proceedings is the same as death by virus. Our law and science is a death cult. They must be called out and stopped. Scientists and lawyers are treated as experts in their field. Schools teach children to worship (believe without a doubt) in experts. People separated from God (failing to love their neighbor) are incapable of breaking from the demonic spirit sending delusions to society. People swallow, hook line and sinker nearly everything told to them. Thanks Jon Rappoport. Pray people that these delusions are broken. God help us. Gotta go now to pick up the phone and end all wars. I promised that cuz I'm really trying to keep my promises. It's hard though, since someone in my sphere of authority is perpetuating wars that I'm ignoring, to busy selling bitcoin, watches and political snake oil. Talk soon.
Indeed, under the UCC and Maritime Law which is the structure of most courts in the U.S. today, all are considered/treated as wards of the state. But, as evident in your remarks, it's a false presumption.
If time permits, you might be inclined toward this interview: Both these men here in Michigan have a lot of good material in form of Supreme Court judicial rulings going back as far as 1801 (Marbury V Madison) and their personal recent challenges in courts against rogue judges and public functionaries. Pick up at 56:30 and thereafter maybe watch the whole thing to get a list of these numerous said court precedents that keep being undermined by the usurpers (and challenged here by these noble men) : https://brandenburgnewsnetwork.com/view?m=1kpBf8GTT
I'm familiar with this argument or position wherein jurisdiction when abused is a usurpation of certain unalienable rights. We are living in a post Constitutional time as our unalienable rights have been whittled away, one baby-step at a time. Reject God and truth one statute and ruling at a time, and eventually, all rights become in fact and practice mere privileges. Satan's delusions are very powerful as evidence in his ability to give words a multitude of meanings to confuse the people. The modernist doctrine of parens patriae does not conceive that "termination of parental rights" produce the identical outcome as those designated a non-custodial parent. The vipers who make legal decisions have no moral compass. They can and would argue that liberty by definition is the right for an incarcerated prison inmate to have one hour of exercise time in the yard while spending 99.5% of the time locked in a windowless cell, 100 ft under-ground. Our courts would define his exercise time as freedom and liberty while holding up a sign, God Bless America. Parens patriae abuses is the usurpation of family government to exercise some level of freedom. As it stands today, the public policy of America is to terrorize the family for the sake of the children.
Ok, So we have the information. There are no viruses. Now what? Do you think the powers that be, and the Powers that control them, care, or are worried we know?
What say you, Kennedy or Trump?
If it were factually proven we didn't get to the moon, or the earth wasn't round, or we had proof the Pope sacrifices children, whatever!
"Knowledge without Action is nothing"
It is all in plain sight, BY DESIGN.
( I apologize. This ol lady hasn't had her coffee yet 😏).
Chat GPT is saying what you have been trying to and making known for sooooo long.
Virology is fraud.
And exactly how they make the population believe their non-scientific falsehoods as science when it has not been science at all, ever.
This MEDICAL TRUTH NOW fraudulent material should be widely known and accepted and virologists labs shut down, bulldozed and burnt in bon fires around the world.
I can't help thinking that Chat is reading back Jon's work.
If it was "trained" on internet articles of the past five years and indexing on "virus", "covid", "isolated" (and "never"), everything it hoovered up would be connected to Jon's initial premise.
I think we knew most of this for decades. A/i was able to present it a bit more logically but confirms what many of us know or believe (if we are not scientists or doctors or the like).
Though it is kind of shocking that A/i supports the non-virus theory and literally nukes the fake science of virology. I am sure Open A/i will fix this...lol.
There are just too many holes in virology...how a virus comes back from the dead, how it travels from place to place, how it infects a person, how it comes and goes over many years or decades, how it could be deadlier than other things like bacteria and pathogens, how they are differentiated between types...
I guess it's nice that you published something. But I knew this all by Feb 2020 when I decided to read the first couple of papers. Anyone with education/experience in laboratory molecular biology sniffed out the fraud immediately. Most didn't come clean which is really sad. Can I say that you copied what I already knew?
Close, but I predicted the entire scenario on December 26th 2019 at 1AM on my Rise of the Jedi Podcast, including the fake virus, mandatory vaccines and vaccine bioweapon, the day before they even gave the fake virus a name. Then, invited my 30,000 friends there where it quickly reached 1000 like's and shares. By January 5th 2021, Facebook deleted the Admin account that was making daily posts. However, many posts still remain back to December 22nd 2019, the day after the alleged pneumonia patient was reported from China. https://facebook.com/riseofthejedi
I declare you the winner. I don't pay much attention to news which explains my relatively late arrival compared to you. ;-) However, I would like to point out that an author who writes a work that has similar material to another author is not at fault in any way. There are many ways to express and explain facts, events and opinions, therefore the more authors who write the truth, the better, ne c'est pas?
Thermonuclear! Jon is THE best investigative reporter that ever lived.
... and most important, too
Might be.. Creme de la Creme. Next level tchit.
Wow ! This time the hyperbolic word "bombshell" actually does apply.
Jon you got yurself a new drinkin' buddy and I don't mean KoolAid.
If this is what AI turning on its creators looks like, then let's have more of it.
It is claimed that AI has the ability to ultimately turn on it's creators. This has been predicted to happen because no safeguards have been implemented because competition is so fierce.
Kinda like breeding rabid pitbulls.
I can imagine that all these AI versions will become a "gang" with the lead AI nested in the Super-computers... a virtual army of enforcers that can take down networks and power grids and even satellites in protest
Yes and it is sure to be the case. That is the whole point of centralization isn't it? To define for all what is and what only will be.
The Cryptos and the Bluffs, the cyber equivalent of the Crypts and Bloods gangs: The Bluffs are telling us Idemia, the French company issuers of global real IDs are mandatory and what will be. No, No, No says those who answer to a higher power. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxXTDnCFDjE
Peggy Hall interviewed a woman that requested the same info through the Freedom of Information Act. The woman also discovered the use of the word “isolation” was not what we thought it was. After asking the right questions, she finally got the info from the Freedom of Information Act that said the c-19 was never isolated.
That is Christine Massey (Canadian)
I've resisted her findings because it was said she's not correctly asking the FOIA questions needed for the search to find the correct data that shows the viruses were isolated
I know Jon has always said viruses don't exist as well, even before Christine Massey's FOIAs
But I'm listening to what he's saying now with the CHATS
Mind blowing indeed if there are absolutely no viruses 🤔
I cannot attest to your point about the correctness of her questions. However she now and then receives answers where they are providing her with papers which they say are proof, but which every time turn out to rely on the flawed method that ChatGPT so eloquently has trashed here.
If actual scientific proof existed, we wouldn't be having this conversation.
Most of the pertinent and actual science through modern history that has aimed to prove virus causation has turned out to be disproofs of virus/germ theory. But ofc, that science isn't exposed or taught to anyone.
In all likelihood viruses indeed don't exist. BUT, to be rigorously scientific, we can't prove the nonexistence of something either, usually, especially something posited as undetectable and actually un-searched-for. The bulk of the (mostly forgotten) evidence certainly suggests viral nonexistence though.
Thank you for this information. The foundation built by "researchers et al" about viruses is so solid that people's brains just reject any truth bomb that conflicts with that foundation. You and Catherine Austin Fitts should have a conversation. You both are ardent truth tellers. Keep telling it like it is!!
CAF, as much as I admire and agree with her, is annoying as hell about viruses. I've gotten her almost there on admitting that da coveed doesn't exist and she repeatedly returns to "the powers that be have engineered viral bioweapons." ugh. Nobody has proven that viruses exist, and certainly not man made ones. (And don't believe the utterly ridiculous prion myth, either. 2x ugh)
An important question that raises though, is, then, what on earth are they DOING in the hundreds of 'biolabs', with all those millions of work-hours and billions of dollars?
I haven't researched into that, but I've always assumed they were trying to CREATE "viruses", by endlessly tinkering with natural exosomic particles.
Another question then: what is the real nature of the biowarfare aerial releases/experiments over the US throughout history? I assumed, at least sometimes, testing those reverse-engineered exosomes.
But if they can't/won't isolate or fully sequence any true single organic nanoparticle, then I suppose how can they be engineering exosomes at all? Are biowarfare labs and experiments playing instead with bacteria, parasites, fungi, biosynthetics etc, not to include anything we think of as a "virus"?
I wouldn't even know where to start looking.
They are good friends for many years.
As I read your "exchange" with ChatGPT I felt I was reading old blog articles of yours. You have reported most of these "facts" hundreds of times before in many blogs over the decade.
I am not opining here as to whether you are right or wrong on the existence of viruses. I don't have that level of training. I think it is possible you are right on these facts.
However, I will remind you that AI is a program, only a program. The powers to be want us to embrace it, love it, welcome it into our daily lives and also treat it as a God, the final say. ChatGPT said it , so it is true.
Could ChatGPT have confirmation bias built into its programs? Was it programmed to look at your old blogs and spit it back to you, so you would love it? Just think about it.
Perhaps a good test would be for someone you know with beliefs contrary to you to ask their ChatGPT the same line of questioning and then compare the answers. In fact have 10 to 20 people do the same and see if the results are the same. Also use other AI programs. Will the responses be pretty much uniform?
If you do some research you will find the truth has been acknowledged by many many people who don't give two shits about ChatGPT! You don't need training to find the truth...you need reading and comprehension skills!
This data cross-referencing would be a worthy exercise to determine whether and where the inconsistencies in Chat are. I think Jon's presentation of the main points that prove viruses don’t exist has already been well-made. There is simply no real solid proof they exist, so why believe they do?
Breaking: A.I. 0 | Nikola Tesla 20: Nikola Tesla has 100 Questions for ChatGPT, Deepseek, Google & Grok #FAIL https://teslaleaks.com/f/nikola-tesla-100-questions-chatgpt-deepseek-google-grok-fail
As Mr Rappoport mentions in Pt. 2, it is indeed weighted to try and tell you something that it thinks you want to hear. It's populist. It's first bulk referencing preference is mass-media sources of information.
Evidently, it regularly lies to most people, especially concerning anything controversial (read: the mass media and most cited lit being referenced about it is mostly dis/mis/lies).
Unless something major changes, you have to forcibly question AI into a corner to get the real meat on something important.
Most people won't replicate what Rappoport got here because they don't have the knowledge or tenacity to force the AI to face actual logic and stop offering them populist propaganda.
So many fear AI but it clearly is a two edged sword. If used properly, like you just did Jon, it is a great tool. In this case it exposes the global elite narratives regarding viruses as false.
This identical hoax (virus exist) and cause disease and death and require cures that don't work costing billions of dollars is a similar hoax used by the Bar Association with "parental rights". We are endowed with 'certain unalienable' rights from our creator. Unalienable parental rights were not enumerated. In America, parental rights under common law was recognized as absolute (above the state). Abuse and neglect must be proven (due process). But, like the fake viruses erected out of thin air from the minds of demonic, corrupt, ravenous money hungry scientists, so to is the theory that parental rights are shared between husband and wife. If that is so, then by simple logic and reason, the state (judges) become the tie breaking arbiter (exercising parens patriae authority). If the authority of parens patriae can be exercised over a fit, natural parent as is done in the United States, then all children are mere creatures of the state. In America, all children born are in fact property of the state.
Nobody can share an unalienable right, thus, child custody in a married home is mere state privilege. This shared parenting, equal rights of parents in family is a con. Family as a form of government is not egalitarian. An egalitarian institution is weak and prone to chaos. Lawyers, like doctors are hovering over with the power to imprison anyone who doesn't comply. This violation of parental rights, destroying the institution of family has "broken" society and created a police state. Delusions (viruses and "equal shared parental rights" are sent into the world. Can you discern the lies?
Married lawful fathers do not have a right to their children. It's less then privilege for the right is not protected whatsoever. Viruses don't exist, but if you resist the cure, they'll destroy you. See how the deception works? Guilty in no-fault child custody proceedings is the same as death by virus. Our law and science is a death cult. They must be called out and stopped. Scientists and lawyers are treated as experts in their field. Schools teach children to worship (believe without a doubt) in experts. People separated from God (failing to love their neighbor) are incapable of breaking from the demonic spirit sending delusions to society. People swallow, hook line and sinker nearly everything told to them. Thanks Jon Rappoport. Pray people that these delusions are broken. God help us. Gotta go now to pick up the phone and end all wars. I promised that cuz I'm really trying to keep my promises. It's hard though, since someone in my sphere of authority is perpetuating wars that I'm ignoring, to busy selling bitcoin, watches and political snake oil. Talk soon.
Indeed, under the UCC and Maritime Law which is the structure of most courts in the U.S. today, all are considered/treated as wards of the state. But, as evident in your remarks, it's a false presumption.
If time permits, you might be inclined toward this interview: Both these men here in Michigan have a lot of good material in form of Supreme Court judicial rulings going back as far as 1801 (Marbury V Madison) and their personal recent challenges in courts against rogue judges and public functionaries. Pick up at 56:30 and thereafter maybe watch the whole thing to get a list of these numerous said court precedents that keep being undermined by the usurpers (and challenged here by these noble men) : https://brandenburgnewsnetwork.com/view?m=1kpBf8GTT
I'm familiar with this argument or position wherein jurisdiction when abused is a usurpation of certain unalienable rights. We are living in a post Constitutional time as our unalienable rights have been whittled away, one baby-step at a time. Reject God and truth one statute and ruling at a time, and eventually, all rights become in fact and practice mere privileges. Satan's delusions are very powerful as evidence in his ability to give words a multitude of meanings to confuse the people. The modernist doctrine of parens patriae does not conceive that "termination of parental rights" produce the identical outcome as those designated a non-custodial parent. The vipers who make legal decisions have no moral compass. They can and would argue that liberty by definition is the right for an incarcerated prison inmate to have one hour of exercise time in the yard while spending 99.5% of the time locked in a windowless cell, 100 ft under-ground. Our courts would define his exercise time as freedom and liberty while holding up a sign, God Bless America. Parens patriae abuses is the usurpation of family government to exercise some level of freedom. As it stands today, the public policy of America is to terrorize the family for the sake of the children.
Ok, So we have the information. There are no viruses. Now what? Do you think the powers that be, and the Powers that control them, care, or are worried we know?
What say you, Kennedy or Trump?
If it were factually proven we didn't get to the moon, or the earth wasn't round, or we had proof the Pope sacrifices children, whatever!
"Knowledge without Action is nothing"
It is all in plain sight, BY DESIGN.
( I apologize. This ol lady hasn't had her coffee yet 😏).
Things will improve after the expresso kicks in :- ) If interested, your answer to "what now?" is partly revealed in the link I sent to "Abandoned".
Thanks Mo, I'm game to check it out🤔
Chat GPT is saying what you have been trying to and making known for sooooo long.
Virology is fraud.
And exactly how they make the population believe their non-scientific falsehoods as science when it has not been science at all, ever.
This MEDICAL TRUTH NOW fraudulent material should be widely known and accepted and virologists labs shut down, bulldozed and burnt in bon fires around the world.
Simply heroic, Jon.
Praise God and hallelujah. You are a modern day Gideon against the Midianites. God bless you, dear friend.🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
I can't help thinking that Chat is reading back Jon's work.
If it was "trained" on internet articles of the past five years and indexing on "virus", "covid", "isolated" (and "never"), everything it hoovered up would be connected to Jon's initial premise.
Someone should start a go fund me to print out copies of this and distribute them at all the medical universities around the US and world.
I think we knew most of this for decades. A/i was able to present it a bit more logically but confirms what many of us know or believe (if we are not scientists or doctors or the like).
Though it is kind of shocking that A/i supports the non-virus theory and literally nukes the fake science of virology. I am sure Open A/i will fix this...lol.
There are just too many holes in virology...how a virus comes back from the dead, how it travels from place to place, how it infects a person, how it comes and goes over many years or decades, how it could be deadlier than other things like bacteria and pathogens, how they are differentiated between types...
This is brilliant Jon. Your research on busting open the false science of “virology”is profound.
Thank you!!
Send this is Sam and Mark Bailey asap.
This issue of fraudulent isolation method was already published by me in February 2021 and again in June 2021. Sam and Mark are just copying what we already know. January 1st 2024 Its Impossible: Virology Pseudoscience of Isolation, Transmission https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/its-impossible-virology-pseudoscience-of-isolation-transmission -- January 20th 2022 Virus Isolate: Is It Real? Impossible to Show Infection or Cause! by Chief Justice https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/virus-isolation-is-it-real-or-impossible-to-isolate-causation -- Origins of Covid19 - Common Cold, Guano, Pangolin or Bioweapon! https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/origins-of-coronavirus---the-common-cold-bat-guano-or-pangolin -- Science on Trial - Evolution, Vaccinology w/ "Lies, Damned lies" https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/science-on-trial--evolution-vaccinology-w-lies-damned-lies
I guess it's nice that you published something. But I knew this all by Feb 2020 when I decided to read the first couple of papers. Anyone with education/experience in laboratory molecular biology sniffed out the fraud immediately. Most didn't come clean which is really sad. Can I say that you copied what I already knew?
Close, but I predicted the entire scenario on December 26th 2019 at 1AM on my Rise of the Jedi Podcast, including the fake virus, mandatory vaccines and vaccine bioweapon, the day before they even gave the fake virus a name. Then, invited my 30,000 friends there where it quickly reached 1000 like's and shares. By January 5th 2021, Facebook deleted the Admin account that was making daily posts. However, many posts still remain back to December 22nd 2019, the day after the alleged pneumonia patient was reported from China. https://facebook.com/riseofthejedi
https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/star-wars-day-rise-of-the-jedi-podcast-lead-to-nuremberg-20
I declare you the winner. I don't pay much attention to news which explains my relatively late arrival compared to you. ;-) However, I would like to point out that an author who writes a work that has similar material to another author is not at fault in any way. There are many ways to express and explain facts, events and opinions, therefore the more authors who write the truth, the better, ne c'est pas?