31 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Loved it, Jon! I'd say you really outdid yourself with this one, but then again I think you do that pretty often so I won't say that. I was thinking how we could get this piece in front of the corporate idiots and anyone else that holds any sway in Hollywood, but then I figured you probably know such people and they've probably heard how logical your opinions are on the matter and how self-evident it is, and they've probably also heard from others that share your opinion. How they couldn't also understand and agree with such clear logic on the matter is truly mind boggling. I mean, how is it that in light of their crashing viewership that they don't realize ever-increasing numbers of people are totally fed up and disgusted with their woke, crazy product content?

Some independent citizen journalists have revealed that Vanguard/Blackrock own the majority of stock in some of the largest corporations and as such are coercing them to pander to the wokies under threat of Blackrock pulling their stock from those companies. They say this explains why such companies were willing to produce woke advertisements, e.g., Bud Lite using a transvestite in its commercials, despite knowing that doing so would cause a big loss to their revenue and customer base. I wonder to what extent that's also happening to the Hollywood film business? Surely, the content creators of Yellowstone know the pushback and loss of viewership that's going to happen because of their latest perversion of the Yellowstone series. So why would they do that? Surely they've seen it's bad business to submit to "wokeness philosophy." My final conclusions on the matter are that I must be missing a whole lot of vital data that would explain the reasons for the unspeakably stupid moves they've been making for the last couple of decades. In any case, loved that you pulled no punches and took no prisoners in this piece.

Expand full comment