Is Twitter a fake phantom? Musk deal on hold
If you were crazy like a fox, and you had the capacity to invent millions of fake people who all seem to be agreeing, loudly and publicly, on issues you want to promote…
Would you hesitate for a second?
Zero Hedge: “Speaking virtually at the ‘All In’ summit tech conference, Musk speculated that at minimum, Twitter is ‘20% bots,’ before asking rhetorically whether it was potentially 80-90% bots.”
“He added that there’s ‘no way’ to know the actual number of bots on the platform.”
“Musk said that a viable deal for Twitter is ‘not out of the question,’ but at a lower price.”
Non-human fake bot accounts are set up for what reason?
To promote certain favored issues, to massively attack those who oppose those issues. To falsely create the appearance of broad consensus.
These are serious things.
Musk is provoking a real storm here. He’s raising all sorts of nasty questions about the essence of Twitter.
And what is Twitter’s sole product? Tweets. From a business point of view, what happens if a major, major chunk of that publicly traded company’s product is a pure fake?
Another question: Who set up all those fake accounts? Who are the players?
Another question: Why did Twitter establish itself, from the beginning, as a company that couldn’t or wouldn’t verify accounts as real or fake?
When all is said and done, is Twitter a wholly owned propaganda subsidiary of Someone Else?
If so, then the platform is the number-one smash hit on the chart of propaganda/disinformation ops of all time.
Project Veritas just released an undercover videos---featuring Twitter senior engineer, Siru Murugesan, who said:
“Twitter does not believe in free speech… Elon believes in free speech…Our jobs are at stake, he's a capitalist and we weren't really operating as capitalists, more like very socialist. Like we're all like commie as fuck…I don't know if two [political] parties can truly coexist on one platform.”
Does that sound like a clue about where all the bot accounts are coming from?
At a deeper level than the Democratic Party, the existence of Twitter as an ingenious propaganda outlet inventing millions of fake human accounts…begs for a connection to be made to…
The champion of fakery…
The CIA (and other intelligence agencies).
So far, I’ve found no definitive specific evidence tying Twitter to the CIA. But then I thought:
Quite possibly, the CIA doesn’t need or want that high-level connection. If the AGENCY is inventing millions of fake bot Twitter accounts…
It already has the only connection it needs, and it already knows everything it needs to know about Twitter.
-- Jon Rappoport