45 Comments
User's avatar
Melissa  P's avatar

And yet!!! He’s making deals with PHizer?? What is really going on?

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

Trump is the figure head—but he still answers to lobbyists. There's no chess move here; its simply the facts: Trump is here to make big pharma money as they are one of the biggest lobbyists out there: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/understanding-the-ruling-class-of

Crixcyon's avatar

It's all politics and dealing with the big pharma devil. Nothing is going to change except on the peripheral of health matters and concerns. Just enough so that the public is entranced into believing these clowns care about our health. THEY DO NOT!

An honestly healthy population means that the economy sinks by at least 10% since the medical mafia commands almost 19% of it. Wages, incomes, profits, taxes. If people are healthier, they don't need drugs, vaccines and doctors. Engaging with the medical mafia is not the path to better health. Escaping it is.

You cannot excuse the fact that ALL drugs and ALL vaccines (and mRNA substances) are toxic and poisonous. No vaccine or drug can be made to be healthy for the body to use. These depopulationists are still in love with mRNA poisons. They are being advertised everywhere you look. More mRNA vaccines are being developed by the dozens. That speaks volumes and RFK will never change that.

Grazyna Samborska's avatar

Depopulation and trans-humanism...

Kat811's avatar

Yes, and well said.

M W's avatar

Health care has always been the primary tool to usher in communism.

They’ll usher in wearables and justify it by saying it’s necessary to keep healthy. And we need to lower health care costs, and the wearable will do that.

Then they’ll include it as input to your social credit score. Now, add in digital currency.

CM Maccioli's avatar

Yes. Kennedy could do that, but he won't. Tulsi Gabbard as well. Two good people in very high positions of power, completely handcuffed by Trump. Maybe that's why he put them there. Keep your enemies closer. Both these two should have already resigned and given HUGE interviews on national TV, but then again, they wouldn't have been aired. Good intentions, I have no doubt, that's why they took the jobs, but they both are on the wrong side of history now and just going along. What's worse than surrendering your principles for cash?

Kat811's avatar

Good article. But who are the gatekeepers for the top headline and how long it stays? How do you bypass them? I have seen the manipulation over and over: An article about nothing (celebrity BS) stays for days and an article with important info disappears in less than half a day. If you say it's the managing editor, fine... but who controls them? I'm guessing the same people who forced the Covid fear program on the world. The message was forced; the resistance was censored.

M W's avatar

CIA. Look up Operation Mockingbird. Journalists were on the CIA payroll. It was revealed 50 years ago, which means it’s been going on much longer.

CIA also had a part in the creation of Ms Magazine and Playboy. Steinem and Hefner were both on their payroll. So, was Timothy Leary who pushed for LSD usage.

Also, look into the “elites” analyzing how much of the media they needed to control to influence the people. They concluded they need only control 25 newspapers.

Kat811's avatar

Thanks. I was aware of Operation Mockingbird, but not those details. I read about it years ago. But I know the CIA is a tool of the elites and billionaires/globalists with despicable motives. Nothing surprises me. The higher up the Control ladder, the more demonic it gets. My opinion.

M W's avatar

Unfortunately, I also think many of the podcasters are controlled. They don’t have to change your mind, they just have to deflect your thinking and say enough to get you thinking the way they want.

As an example, look at the Charlie Kirk event. The federal government is absolutely lying. And many podcasters are coming up with conflicting theories. Those who think it’s all a lie, now have any of dozens of theories to hang onto.

Would also recommend looking into the Dodd Report to the Reece Committee. The government looked into non-profits. It learned that the prestigious ones had a goal - to put the U.S. into a position where it could seamlessly be merged with the Soviet Union. They were influencing education, etc.

That was in the early 1950s. Nothing happened.

Kat811's avatar

We live in strange times. I've seen so much weirdness even since the Charlie Kirk event. My concern is that there is almost no resistance to the Islamic invasion of Western society, while at the same time I see unprecedented Israel-bashing. Then the election of "Democratic" Socialists. It's alarming. Young people have been indoctrinated to accept this. The trends are obvious and it's not good. For instance, Nick Fuentes is becoming an opinion leader for young men? Scary. I have a theory about him.

M W's avatar

What’s your theory? I don’t think anyone who is truly “grassroots” gets blown up like Fuentes and others. Don’t trust Candace Owens or Russell Brand either. I’ll occasionally listen but I question everything they say.

I remember an episode on The Man Show where they set up a booth and were getting women to sign a petition to “End Women’s Suffrage”.

It was a funny joke. Fuentes actually wants to do it. There isn’t extreme backlash in the media. So it has to be part of an agenda.

Fuentes is a nerdy version of Andrew Tate, whose publicity I never understood. Both Candace Owens, whose husband is friends with Tate, and Tucker Carlson gave Tate softball interviews.

Candace doesn’t have any of the background to get where she is. She was chosen. Look at the ties of her husband.

Check out the recent Tin Foil Hat podcast with Jay Dyer.Link below. I think Jay says Israel doesn’t have issues with Muslims. Think much of what we’ve been told is manipulation and misdirection.

I’m a fan of Jay Dyer, Richard Grove, and Sam Tripoli. Would also recommend Courtenay Taylor (she’s on SS). She’s connected dots that are troubling.

https://samtripoli.substack.com/p/tfh-940-the-bank-of-england-with?utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&triedRedirect=true

Unrelated. But watch this. Unbelievable. It’s with Richard Grove.

https://youtu.be/HlKjMyyKBPw

Kat811's avatar

My theory is that there is a rising backlash from young white men who have felt attacked and marginalized for some decades. Media, educators, Hollywood, all bashing men, particularly white men. So Fuentes attacks Israel as having undue influence in America, particularly in those areas. I think there may be a concerted effort to push the "Muslim Program" on western society and some have said Israel is actually behind it. Open borders, programs to support all the migrants, low birth rates in Europe, UK, US, and high birthrates and high immigration of non-Western cultures, particularly Muslims. What has happened in places like London, Paris, etc. is the pattern that is being followed all around the world. So it looks like Israel, the Deep State, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Pope, the King of England, the media, etc are all on the same side and want to push Islam on the world. When you have "Islamophobia" being punished with fines and jail terms, you have to question what's behind it. With Fuentes, for instance (and other pod-casters), I started thinking maybe he just admires Islam, because "Muslims control their women". Men in America feel sidelined and out of control, and so maybe that appeals to these young men, especially incels. Wild theory, I know. Thanks for the links. Will check them out.

Ed's avatar

Editors decide?

Maybe editors decide to run whatever the owners of their periodical tell them to run...or lose their jobs. I think that if Bobby Jr released any of those things that should dominate the news, the editors would decide to run a story about some celebrity actor/activist's latest romantic breakup.

M W's avatar

You do realize that Robert Maxwell, the father of Ghislaine and who was a Mossad asset, owned and operated a media empire that included newspapers.

Look into the consolidation of media companies. Think all media is owned by 6 companies.

For example, Fox News and the Wall Street Journal have the same owner. To push a story one need only site the other. The viewer / reader thinks it’s independence thought. But it’s not.

Finally, most of what is called “news” today. Isn’t. It’s just the opinions of some person or panel on a program. That’s propaganda. You get paid the big bucks to spread propaganda. Not tell the truth.

Kat811's avatar

Definitely, and it's pretty clear what the messaging is. It is especially aimed at the youth. (I feel old when I say "youth" LOL. ) But look at how they vote. They think socialism would be great, they spout mostly Dem talking points, eg victim mentality, identity politics, embrace big government, open borders, etc. etc. Feel-good virtue-signaling.

Multipolonius's avatar

The corrupt n criminal medical institutions wield enormous power n influence. They may even be dangerous to whistleblowers. Kennedy knows how institutions strike brutally. Thus we have the current state of MAHA……

Billy Bob's avatar

Does anyone really think those dependent on lobbyists funds to maintain their political chair will allow anyone else in DC to jeopardize the flow of contributions? Kennedy is responsible for more than the CDC and he knows how the game is played. Any action he takes that disrupts the flow of lobbyists’ campaign cash will result in unimaginable consequences. He’s aware of it and has to tread carefully.

M W's avatar

That’s nonsense. RFK, Jr is merely an opportunist. He screwed over every one who helped with his campaign. Just look into the lies he told Nicole Shanahan, who was interested in the vaccine - autism connection.

RFK, Jr is invested in gene therapies. So are many other members of Trump’s administration and those who influence Trump.

Billy Bob's avatar

Self-interest isn’t a new attribute…he’s perhaps working on HIS legacy in competition with his other famous relatives. Humans are known to do unscrupulous deeds to establish a legacy, not so uncommon in revealed history records that are culled to maintain “our story”.

Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

We've won some wins with Trump and RFK—but from Tylenol and Autism to Deals with big Pharma—we're also making deals with the Devil. And that's never going to turn out for the best.

Proberta's avatar

RFK Jr would not be where he is if he wasn't serving The Order.

Joseph A Gorski's avatar

It’s difficult to know what is going on behind the scenes. There are some accomplishments like phasing out petroleum based food dies, deals to lower some drug costs, putting more focus on vaccine harms, and calling out Tylenol harms. Leaving WHO and not cooperating with them in the form of a treaty was a big win. Still the corrupt system of poisoning us is mostly intact. Aerial spraying in the atmosphere still goes on. Drug companies still dominate the advertising space on television. Gates is still allowed to spread his propaganda and harm the people of the world. RFK definitely can be much more visible as you correctly point out.

M W's avatar

Recommend looking into pharmaceuticals. The trials and studies are manipulated / rigged. Most drugs sold aren’t nearly as beneficial as the public is led to believe. In Bad Pharma, the author says many would be better off taking a sugar pill than a prescription medicine.

But, hey, if you can buy the worthless poison for less, it’s a good thing. It’s even better if the government pays for the worthless medicine.

A doctor looked into high blood pressure medications. He realized that diuretics worked the best and were cheap. He told his doctor friends.

Later, he followed up. Over 60% were still prescribing the more expensive drugs.

Are the new patented drugs any better than the old drugs no longer on patent? My guess is absolutely not.

We’ve been led to believe “new” equals “better”. It’s not always the case. Even coming across stories on how poorly built many new homes are.

Joseph A Gorski's avatar

Believe me I have looked into pharmaceuticals and agree with you. It’s a racket.

Anthony Zappia's avatar

How does Kennedy mount a PR campaign using the kinds of evidence you suggested if the MSM is against him? Who controls the media? Do you really think they would allow that type of material to be aired? What little they might allow would most certainly be slanted in the negatives. There are millions of Americans who think Kennedy is a nutcase. Their views will never change...until they personally experience harm from the system, I.e. the hard way. And even then, many will convince themselves that it happened because of genetic circumstances.It is easier to lie to someone than convince them they've been lied to.

Bassehound's avatar

Apparently part of this amazing MAHA summit shindig attendees Nueralink, Walmart and CRISPR creatures.

MAHA Holdings, huh? The shenanigans don’t stop.

“ The event will kick off with remarks by Tony Lyons, a key Kennedy supporter and head of MAHA Action, followed by Finn Kennedy, one of Kennedy’s sons who is listed as a board member of MAHA Holdings.”

“Kennedy will deliver the closing keynote following an “eloquent rant” by actor, conspiracy theorist and MAHA acolyte Russell Brand.”

MAHA health summit features Trump officials

https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5601061-health-summit-trump-officials/

BREAKING: Pfizer’s CEO Says Working With RFK Jr. Was “Very Productive”

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/breaking-pfizers-ceo-says-working?publication_id=581065&utm_campaign=email-post-title&r=k6gro&utm_medium=email

M W's avatar

Heard a nurse say that she knew of several pregnant women who got vaccinated while pregnant. All but 1 miscarried.

mo's avatar

Dancin' with myself :- )

Celia, once again hittin' it out of the part by linking this interview: https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/the-man-who-saw-it-all-paramedic

ForestDi56's avatar

I don’t get him, either. And am very disappointed.

MD's avatar

He's just another fake front man. A lot like a clown is for a circus. 🤡

curt s sanders's avatar

Agreed.. don't let go of it, Jon... Absolute fact.. RFK Junior has been neutralized.. He's not the same guy we saw on the campaign trail. Nope. There are quite a few possible reasons... One possible scenario is that he had a visitor who made him an offer he couldn't refuse.. 'keep your mouth shut or we're going to kill everybody in your family and all your friends systematically with plausible cover for each and every execution..' And the ones you love most, well, we're gonna torture the holy hell out of them.. Slow and grizzly.. over a period of a few days.. I don't know?? or maybe it's a combination of some strange drugs that are misted on him periodically that he has no hint of, a new and improved MKULTRA ? And the previous threat..?

And however outrageous The murders of his family might be... MSM won't cover a lick of it... no.. Not three minutes anywhere around the globe on any MSM.. zero coverage about His entire family being killed and mutilated in a 14 day.. Period... the WEF/DOD/CIA have got all the resources to do the aforementioned and 100 others..