Is the Medical Freedom movement really a public relations trick?

(This is Part-11 in a series; for Part-12, click here; for Part-10, click here.)

The answer: not all of it; but an essential part IS just public relations.

And it is a trick.

It was devised by politicians, doctors, reporters, and analysts who didn’t want to appear “crazy” to mainstream media and the American people.

If they went all in and said what they really believed about VACCINES, they WOULD have appeared to be crazy.

So they watered down their stance.

This is what they settled on: “I’m not a radical. I’m not against vaccines. I just want to make them safer. What I really want is the freedom to choose. The freedom to decide whether to get vaccinated or not. If we can get THAT, we’re all good…”

This is like saying, “We don’t have to win the game. We just have to score some points.”

As I, and thousands of other independent investigators have demonstrated, vaccines have always been dangerous and destructive. That’s what they ARE. Inherently.

But many well-known leaders in the Medical Freedom movement have stopped short of saying that. On purpose.

They’ve essentially decided it’s all right for pharma companies to keep turning out brain damaging injections—crippling much of the population—

As long as people can decide not to take the injections.

In other words, mass poisoning is all right, as long as you and I can opt out of taking the poisons.

Because the really important thing is: don’t appear to be radical and crazy in our statements. That’s the number one priority.

We can say we’re mainstream, and point to studies and reports issued by health agencies that raise concerns about vaccine safety.

We can say, “See? We’re no different from the official experts. They raise questions about safety and so do we. We’re misunderstood. We’re not a bunch of whackos.“

What I’m pointing out to you is: