22 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Except that it's pretty clear at this point from Christine Massey's work that if anyone had an actual sample of a "covid-19" virus we'd have seen such a confirmation by now. Nope, all they have are software-generated simulations.

That first 'argument' isn't an argument. Come up with an isolate of ANY virus from patient samples. They can't. The lie is so big and blatant, that's why it persists. Too big to fail.

Expand full comment

Seems true. The people who know they are following bioinformatics and not analytic chemistry should come clean and explain why they think that this is a valid description of a real microbe in the real world. But I think most microbiologists don't even realize they are being bamboozled by a clever computer fraud, and many wrong assumptions. The psychological need to defend their own territory is very strong. If they ever realize their state, they quietly go to the side of the deniers. Unless they are engaged in politics, which freezes people's minds.

And so, everyone has to live their own life to the best of their abilities, gaining moral autonomy along the way.

Expand full comment