Looking at this contention --- as to whether or not the coronavirus exists or not,... (start digression: and, by extension, what are those PCR Tests and HomeKit/Harmacy Tests actually detecting,... and then, say, coronavirus were to be proven to exist scientifically (some say it already has been proven to exist scientifically),... THEN,…
Looking at this contention --- as to whether or not the coronavirus exists or not,... (start digression: and, by extension, what are those PCR Tests and HomeKit/Harmacy Tests actually detecting,... and then, say, coronavirus were to be proven to exist scientifically (some say it already has been proven to exist scientifically),... THEN, does IT then cause SOME, ALL, of the various multitudes of the various symptoms attributed to IT (from the mild, to the severe, to DEATH [skull&crossbones emoji]) -- that can't otherwise be explained by the given set of environmental factors present in/around each particular individual? /end digression) --- FROM a "Public Relations" perspective...
...is one of the main contentions that if "we (or, some of us, a noisy contingent within the rank-and-file)" start saying "the coronavirus doesn't exist", then the people that "we" are trying to reach with the very important, life-saving message "don't take the jab, it's poison" will not listen to "us", and will instead, take (or continue to take) the poisonous juice-jab because they think "the coronavirus doesn't exist" contingent are crazy people "so why should I listen to them"?
In other words, from a "Public Relations" perspective, for those in the Steve Kirsch camp, is it primarily "what can we do with our [crowd-sourced] messaging 'broadcasters' to save even more lives than we are already saving with our current messaging"?
And to achieve that end, the message needs to be laser-focused, and, there needs to be no dissension from within the ranks? Just focus on the "don't take the jab, it's poison. Here's why..."? message. "That we can save more lives doing it (the messaging) this way."
It seems to me that anyone making your suggested argument hasn't actually done the investigating and come to terms with the implications of the fact that the entire 'science' of virology is fraud. Once this fact is digested, there's a profound perspective shift, and this foundational, tap-root issue becomes imperative for any meaningful progress in science or in human consciousness. People shying away from the clot shot out of belief, fear, apprehension, going along with their crowd, etc, accomplishes nothing long-term. The medical/pharma criminal cartel goes on unimpeded, people stay dumb, dependent, and afraid, and those people "saved" are culled or crippled during the next round.
This darkness has prevailed for a long time, and ultimately those who want to shelter in the comfort of mass belief and thus remain under the spell of the big lies are casting their vote for continued darkness.
The idea of "no dissension from within the ranks" essentially means no leadership out of the dark belief system we're stuck in. It's attempting to keep the discussion within the current consciousness. Any profound shift in consciousness is fiercely resisted, and the leaders must be willing to take fire from all sides. Only later, when it appears safe to make the leap with lots of company, do most people consider joining. We're still in that early stage where even a hint of the truth is overwhelmingly ugly and scary to 99% of the people, and therefore advertising strategies are not the solution. Advertising strategies are a construct of the fake reality that breeds Rockefeller cartels and slaves.
Looking at this contention --- as to whether or not the coronavirus exists or not,... (start digression: and, by extension, what are those PCR Tests and HomeKit/Harmacy Tests actually detecting,... and then, say, coronavirus were to be proven to exist scientifically (some say it already has been proven to exist scientifically),... THEN, does IT then cause SOME, ALL, of the various multitudes of the various symptoms attributed to IT (from the mild, to the severe, to DEATH [skull&crossbones emoji]) -- that can't otherwise be explained by the given set of environmental factors present in/around each particular individual? /end digression) --- FROM a "Public Relations" perspective...
...is one of the main contentions that if "we (or, some of us, a noisy contingent within the rank-and-file)" start saying "the coronavirus doesn't exist", then the people that "we" are trying to reach with the very important, life-saving message "don't take the jab, it's poison" will not listen to "us", and will instead, take (or continue to take) the poisonous juice-jab because they think "the coronavirus doesn't exist" contingent are crazy people "so why should I listen to them"?
In other words, from a "Public Relations" perspective, for those in the Steve Kirsch camp, is it primarily "what can we do with our [crowd-sourced] messaging 'broadcasters' to save even more lives than we are already saving with our current messaging"?
And to achieve that end, the message needs to be laser-focused, and, there needs to be no dissension from within the ranks? Just focus on the "don't take the jab, it's poison. Here's why..."? message. "That we can save more lives doing it (the messaging) this way."
It seems to me that anyone making your suggested argument hasn't actually done the investigating and come to terms with the implications of the fact that the entire 'science' of virology is fraud. Once this fact is digested, there's a profound perspective shift, and this foundational, tap-root issue becomes imperative for any meaningful progress in science or in human consciousness. People shying away from the clot shot out of belief, fear, apprehension, going along with their crowd, etc, accomplishes nothing long-term. The medical/pharma criminal cartel goes on unimpeded, people stay dumb, dependent, and afraid, and those people "saved" are culled or crippled during the next round.
This darkness has prevailed for a long time, and ultimately those who want to shelter in the comfort of mass belief and thus remain under the spell of the big lies are casting their vote for continued darkness.
The idea of "no dissension from within the ranks" essentially means no leadership out of the dark belief system we're stuck in. It's attempting to keep the discussion within the current consciousness. Any profound shift in consciousness is fiercely resisted, and the leaders must be willing to take fire from all sides. Only later, when it appears safe to make the leap with lots of company, do most people consider joining. We're still in that early stage where even a hint of the truth is overwhelmingly ugly and scary to 99% of the people, and therefore advertising strategies are not the solution. Advertising strategies are a construct of the fake reality that breeds Rockefeller cartels and slaves.