Steve,
I’ve been reading back through Kirsch’s points but am having a hard time finding the article(s) where he addresses the legitimacy of the methods used to “isolate” the virus. I mean, I know he has provided links to the peer reviewed studies, but that’s where it ends. Do you have a link to where he actually takes apart the methods…
I’ve been reading back through Kirsch’s points but am having a hard time finding the article(s) where he addresses the legitimacy of the methods used to “isolate” the virus. I mean, I know he has provided links to the peer reviewed studies, but that’s where it ends. Do you have a link to where he actually takes apart the methods used within those studies he cites. Until then I can’t say I’ve heard him “contend” anything yet. It’s frustrating because I’m looking for any good argument that will challenge the analysis of the likes of Cowan, Kaufman, Bailey, etc. In the spirit of good science it’s necessary to find ways to disprove ones own position. I was hoping Kirsch might give us something to chew on but I’m still looking for it.
Steve,
I’ve been reading back through Kirsch’s points but am having a hard time finding the article(s) where he addresses the legitimacy of the methods used to “isolate” the virus. I mean, I know he has provided links to the peer reviewed studies, but that’s where it ends. Do you have a link to where he actually takes apart the methods used within those studies he cites. Until then I can’t say I’ve heard him “contend” anything yet. It’s frustrating because I’m looking for any good argument that will challenge the analysis of the likes of Cowan, Kaufman, Bailey, etc. In the spirit of good science it’s necessary to find ways to disprove ones own position. I was hoping Kirsch might give us something to chew on but I’m still looking for it.