(This is Part-11 in a series; for Part-12, click here; for Part-10, click here.)
In this piece, I’m talking about the mind control of the public.
In other words, the public’s refusal to believe that the events at the Trump Pennsylvania rally were staged.
Staged to look like a 20-year-old kid got off a miracle shot under great pressure that just happened to graze Trump’s ear—leaving him alive and well and a super-hero…
…when in fact, something else happened to create that impression. Something which so far remains unknown.
Why are people so reluctant to accept or even consider an alternative series of events? Why are their minds so locked up?
Millions of people are convinced the Lee Oswald story about JFK’s assassination is false. Millions of people believe the FBI was complicit in the assassination of Martin Luther King.
Why would many of those same people accept the mainstream reports of what happened at the Trump rally?
Here’s one compelling reason. The Trump rally was very recent. The JFK and MLK murders are distant in time. It’s much easier to reject a mainstream narrative 56 years later. What happened yesterday is more compelling, especially when everybody else around you buys the news reports. 56 years later, it’s safe to say, “The press and the government were lying to us.” Back then.
Consider a few pretended facts about the 1968 murder of Robert Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles:
Kennedy was shot in the back of the head by Sirhan Sirhan. Sirhan got off several shots. The investigation of the murder was very extensive.
These were all obvious lies.
Kennedy was shot in the back of the head, but Sirhan was standing in front of him. At no time was the back of Kennedy’s head turned to Sirhan. Someone standing behind Kennedy killed him. There were 13 shots fired. Far more than the capacity of the gun Sirhan was holding. The “extensive” investigation was carried out not by the FBI, but by a special unit (Special Unit Senator) instantly created within the notoriously corrupt LA Police Department.
In other words, the mainstream story about Sirhan was a cover story. Used to conceal what actually happened.
Why is this so different from a story about a kid using an AR and a scope, who knows he’s about to die, getting off s trillion to one miracle shot from 150 yards away that happens to graze the ear of Donald Trump?
Why would people reject the mainstream account of the murder of Robert Kennedy and accept the mainstream account of the grazing of Donald Trump?
Because the passing of time and history makes it comfortable to say CONSPIRACY, but yesterday makes it uncomfortable and unbelievable.
Your friends may smirk a little when you tell them about the book you just read that describes what really happened to Kennedy at the Ambassador Hotel in 1968, but they’ll do more than smirk when you tell them the grazed ear narrative in Pennsylvania a month ago makes zero sense.
They may decide to skip your birthday party next month. They may look at you like you have some infectious incurable disease. They may avoid you at work. They may leave you out of poker night. They may tell their friends you’re crazy.
The headlines and stories on FOX, CNN, MSNBC will tell you you’re wrong. The talking news heads who love Trump and hate him will tell you you’re wrong.
The people who want Trump to be a super-hero will tell you you’re VERY wrong.
So you say, “What the hell. The kid got off a lucky shot.”
See, not every form of mind control is exotic. Some forms are simple. We don’t need force fields from outer space to explain some sort of mass hypnosis that compels large numbers of people to believe the Trump assassination story.
We just need the truth. Speaking out of turn is not comfortable for most people.
Plus—when you’re face to face with the news…NOW…not 50 years ago…those big headlines and big stories told by TV anchors suddenly seem REAL…like waves coming at you.
How could all those waves be utter bullshit?
I’ll tell you how: