Prior to any discussion of vaccines, you would have to establish that many germs do, in fact, cause disease.
Some of the most important work on that issue is being done by Christine Massey.
For years, she and her colleagues have been sending Freedom of Information requests to public health agencies all over the world, requesting evidence proving viruses exist; and evidence proving other types of germs exist or cause disease.
The results have been stunning, to say the least: No convincing evidence for the existence of viruses; and no convincing evidence that other types of germs, if they exist at all, cause disease.
Most researchers run away from Massey’s findings at high speed. They don’t want to deal with her work in any way, shape, or form.
Just one of a number of implications: why in the world are people developing or taking vaccines? They’re meant to prevent illness caused by germs that don’t exist. Or they’re meant to prevent illness caused by germs never proved to cause any harm whatsoever.
Plus—what about actual factors that DO cause disease? Such as grossly deficient nutrition and lack of basic sanitation and environmental toxins. Vaccines are going to neutralize those factors??
There’s more.
Even if we assume (based on nothing) that, say, a whole host of viruses do exist and do cause illness, there is an insurmountable issue called “the adjuvant problem.”
All traditional vaccines contain adjuvants (e.g., aluminum compounds), which supposedly increase the immune system’s response to the vaccine, and make the rehearsal called vaccination highly effective at “preparing” the body for the real thing (the disease-causing germ) if and when it later comes along.
However, there is a fatal flaw in this argument.