I've been a long time reader & know (as best I can) your process of research: scientific & medical journals, papers, honest expert interviews & review, etc.
I also actually feel, b/c of things you've previously written about, that you have an out (not that you need one).
If someone accused you of being a absolute-no-virus believer, they…
I've been a long time reader & know (as best I can) your process of research: scientific & medical journals, papers, honest expert interviews & review, etc.
I also actually feel, b/c of things you've previously written about, that you have an out (not that you need one).
If someone accused you of being a absolute-no-virus believer, they could easily lift an all-too-quick quote, such as, "BECAUSE THERE IS NO VIRUS." Or some such.
However.
In a Piece you long ago Wrote, about A True Neutral Observer, entering a lab, first hazmatting a suit plastic or rubber, in which you explained how bench-biochemistry & cell biology, is supposed to be conducted, step by protocoled step, then test the isolate, in vivo, via Koch postulates, you concluded with something like...
"And until that time, and until no such other, should I scientifically-accept, an isolate."
It is hard for me to disagree with that.
You've probably been asked this question before.
"What's the freakin' deal with the biolabs. The dark money, DoD & other lettered agencies, warring-at-a-different scale crazy-ideations, Gates & Epstein & other high-roller money-venturing, the sickening of monkeys & other animal testing."
JR,
I've been a long time reader & know (as best I can) your process of research: scientific & medical journals, papers, honest expert interviews & review, etc.
I also actually feel, b/c of things you've previously written about, that you have an out (not that you need one).
If someone accused you of being a absolute-no-virus believer, they could easily lift an all-too-quick quote, such as, "BECAUSE THERE IS NO VIRUS." Or some such.
However.
In a Piece you long ago Wrote, about A True Neutral Observer, entering a lab, first hazmatting a suit plastic or rubber, in which you explained how bench-biochemistry & cell biology, is supposed to be conducted, step by protocoled step, then test the isolate, in vivo, via Koch postulates, you concluded with something like...
"And until that time, and until no such other, should I scientifically-accept, an isolate."
It is hard for me to disagree with that.
You've probably been asked this question before.
"What's the freakin' deal with the biolabs. The dark money, DoD & other lettered agencies, warring-at-a-different scale crazy-ideations, Gates & Epstein & other high-roller money-venturing, the sickening of monkeys & other animal testing."
WHAT THE F--- ARE [they] DOING IN THERE ?
Thank You.
Maybe they're making the lovely sprays that cloud our skies and poison us.
Aluminum, barium, coal fly ash, and whatever other toxic nanoparticulates they can think to kill us faster.
Yes. Many Researchers, have discovered, precisely all those factors, you've listed.
Not many reasons to be cheerful. But that's ok, for now.
Cheers !