Since one cannot logically prove a negative I prefer the formulation ‘Viruses have never been scientifically proven to exist’ which places the onus of proof onto virology.
Since one cannot logically prove a negative I prefer the formulation ‘Viruses have never been scientifically proven to exist’ which places the onus of proof onto virology.
includeMeOut: I agree. The onus of proof is on the people making the argument for virology existing. When I ask for proof of viruses, Virus Believers send me links to fuzzy electron microscope "images" and links to scientific papers.
Since one cannot logically prove a negative I prefer the formulation ‘Viruses have never been scientifically proven to exist’ which places the onus of proof onto virology.
includeMeOut: I agree. The onus of proof is on the people making the argument for virology existing. When I ask for proof of viruses, Virus Believers send me links to fuzzy electron microscope "images" and links to scientific papers.