WHO Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations explained (finally)

In this article, I’m not going to detail the contents of the World Health Organization Treaty and their International Health Regulations (IHR).

You can assume either of these documents, if enforced, will torpedo the sovereignty of America, and force the country to accept any World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of a serious disease outbreak or pandemic.

America will be forced to accept WHO strictures that mirror the COVID restrictions—but these new ones will be worse. Even more devastating. Relentless vaccine mandates, deep surveillance and censorship, strict home lockdown imprisonment.

And the WHO could and will declare a pandemic, wholly based on its desire to set up a de facto global medical dictatorship. At any time.

In this piece, I’ll break down the legal factors surrounding the WHO Treaty and the IHR, plus the IHR’s new amendments.

The legal factors are where the rubber meets the road. And digs in, skids, and blows out. Killing the Constitution.

First, the WHO Pandemic Treaty, because it IS a treaty, would have to be ratified by a two-thirds vote of the US Senate.

The President couldn’t unilaterally approve it.

Unless, by some underhanded trickery, the Treaty were renamed an Agreement. Watch out for that. Keep reading to see how this switcheroo works.

Getting two-thirds of the Senate to ratify this Treaty won’t be a walk in the park. But with all the RINOS and Democrats in the Senate—now and after the next few elections—it’s a possibility that shouldn’t be ignored.

The IHR and its new amendments are a whole other proposition. The US signed on to the IHR in 2005.

Since it is labeled an Agreement and not a treaty, new amendments are unilaterally approved by the President.

BOOM.

These new pending amendments will be horrendous. They’ll give the WHO the ability to wreak destruction, as I just described above. COVID-type strictures—only worse.

The Congress can override the President’s unilateral approval of the amendments. How? With a straight majority, by withholding necessary funding, or by passing specific laws that basically cancel and nullify the IHR amendments.

How likely is that?

Not very likely.

THERE IS GREAT DANGER HERE.

I have a few key points to make about these international Agreements, like the IHR:

First, they’re a widely accepted and deeply embedded CON, HUSTLE, AND SHELL GAME…

Originally designed to give more power to the President and Executive Branch—grossly violating the basic meaning of the Constitution and its Checks and Balances.

The Constitution says nothing about international Agreements. Article 2, Section 2, Clause 2 gives the President the power to enact TREATIES with foreign nations—but he must obtain the consent of the Senate by a two-thirds vote.

Clause 2 is often cited to claim the President has the broad power to “conduct foreign affairs,” and therefore to make international Agreements—but this is a REVERSAL of what the Clause actually states.

Again, the Clause only gives the President the specific power to enact treaties, but with the two-thirds support of the Senate. It says NOTHING about the President’s broad power to act like a King when it comes to foreign affairs, by making Agreements.

The invention of international Agreements was entirely illegitimate. There should be no such animal.

It shouldn’t exist at all.

The US originally signing on to the WHO IHR Agreement in 2005 should never have happened. It was entirely unconstitutional. It was an illegal Presidential decision. By George W Bush.

As you can see, the fallacious “Agreement power” is now being used to allow the President to approve the WHO IHR amendments all by himself—thus destroying US sovereignty, unless the Congress acts dramatically to oppose him, by passing new laws or withholding funding.

In the entire history of the United States, I can find NO instance in which a President approved an international Agreement and then the Congress took legislative action to totally destroy (not merely modify) the President’s approval.

Therefore, when the WHO does pass new sovereignty-destroying amendments to the IHR, we are in very deep water.

We need a public uproar. Sustained, and building higher and higher.

We need state governors who will refuse to obey these amendments.

We need bold, smart, articulate passionate lawyers (not bloviators), who will go balls to the wall to show the American public this “Agreements” heist is a shiv in the heart of what America and the Constitution stand for.

Understand something. This country is still full of Covidians. These Left lunatics will trumpet every move the World Health Organization makes. They WANT PROTECTION FROM ABOVE. They revel in the idea of being imprisoned in their homes.

They’ve never wanted freedom.

The millions of us who DO want it have to win this war.

-- Jon Rappoport

(This article is Part-1 in a series. For Part-2, go here.)