Jon,
I’m a big fan! But I disagree! This issue of the existence of viruses is too important to tackle through only one venue. Millions of jobs and trillions of revenue depend upon germ theory being the reigning paradigm. Hence my advice: when overthrowing a scientific paradigm that’s been with us for nearly a hundred years, attack the …
I’m a big fan! But I disagree! This issue of the existence of viruses is too important to tackle through only one venue. Millions of jobs and trillions of revenue depend upon germ theory being the reigning paradigm. Hence my advice: when overthrowing a scientific paradigm that’s been with us for nearly a hundred years, attack the edifice from all sides. Yes, debates can be very helpful!
But at the core of this fragile structure lies the conspicuous absence of a control group. As Lanka as shown, if the same CPE results can be obtained, ceteris paribus ,between heathy and symptomatic individuals, then there is nothing left to prove. Virology stands or falls upon this simple bedrock.
You don't need to debate facts, just show them. That said, there are hundreds of videos with people doing just that, presenting the facts amidst the questions of the interviewers. You can't "debate" someone who refuses to look at facts and resorts to circular reasoning and fallacies. What a waste! Virology has already fallen. As you note, Lanka, for one, has already shown using a control that the same cell death occurs without any "viral" particles added. All science needs controls and why people accept anything less is beyond me. Nephrology has already confirmed what Lanka proved, as well. There is nothing left to debate.
Jon,
I’m a big fan! But I disagree! This issue of the existence of viruses is too important to tackle through only one venue. Millions of jobs and trillions of revenue depend upon germ theory being the reigning paradigm. Hence my advice: when overthrowing a scientific paradigm that’s been with us for nearly a hundred years, attack the edifice from all sides. Yes, debates can be very helpful!
But at the core of this fragile structure lies the conspicuous absence of a control group. As Lanka as shown, if the same CPE results can be obtained, ceteris paribus ,between heathy and symptomatic individuals, then there is nothing left to prove. Virology stands or falls upon this simple bedrock.
You don't need to debate facts, just show them. That said, there are hundreds of videos with people doing just that, presenting the facts amidst the questions of the interviewers. You can't "debate" someone who refuses to look at facts and resorts to circular reasoning and fallacies. What a waste! Virology has already fallen. As you note, Lanka, for one, has already shown using a control that the same cell death occurs without any "viral" particles added. All science needs controls and why people accept anything less is beyond me. Nephrology has already confirmed what Lanka proved, as well. There is nothing left to debate.