Agree. And that's exactly what the nonindependent thinkers do. "Follow the experts" mentality even if those "experts" are just talk show hosts, journalists, or whatever the case may be. That's why it's important that Bigtree and the others actually look seriously at the evidence against the existence of pathogenic viruses and come to the…
Agree. And that's exactly what the nonindependent thinkers do. "Follow the experts" mentality even if those "experts" are just talk show hosts, journalists, or whatever the case may be. That's why it's important that Bigtree and the others actually look seriously at the evidence against the existence of pathogenic viruses and come to the obvious truth and speak out about it. Celia asked why it was so important that Del refutes the viral causation notion and that is why. He at minimum needs to have a clear scientific based response as to why and how it's been proven that they do indeed exist and cause disease which of course isn't possible, or have a reasonable reason why he is choosing not to look at the evidence, and he's not doing that either.
So many substack readers/commenters are of the same mentality as you see with other social media . While substack appeared to, initially anyway, be for those that were being censored elsewhere for their truthful but oppositional views, it has become a free for all for imitators and detractors and outright controlled, (in one way or another), opposition. It will be a good day when all of the truly great writers, journalists, and other contributors to truth and freedom at on the newest platforms, such as Sayer Ji's newest, and Barre Lando's.
Agree. And that's exactly what the nonindependent thinkers do. "Follow the experts" mentality even if those "experts" are just talk show hosts, journalists, or whatever the case may be. That's why it's important that Bigtree and the others actually look seriously at the evidence against the existence of pathogenic viruses and come to the obvious truth and speak out about it. Celia asked why it was so important that Del refutes the viral causation notion and that is why. He at minimum needs to have a clear scientific based response as to why and how it's been proven that they do indeed exist and cause disease which of course isn't possible, or have a reasonable reason why he is choosing not to look at the evidence, and he's not doing that either.
So many substack readers/commenters are of the same mentality as you see with other social media . While substack appeared to, initially anyway, be for those that were being censored elsewhere for their truthful but oppositional views, it has become a free for all for imitators and detractors and outright controlled, (in one way or another), opposition. It will be a good day when all of the truly great writers, journalists, and other contributors to truth and freedom at on the newest platforms, such as Sayer Ji's newest, and Barre Lando's.