20 Comments
User's avatar
DBC's avatar

Since laws are in place - let's enforce them. Any groups that can't assimilate to our culture, shall be deported. Specifically the countries that practice this horrid cult.

SOMALIA.

ETHIOPIA.

EGYPT.

THE SUDAN.

DAWOODI BOHRA SECT (South Asia).

Donna's avatar

The original plan in bringing them here was to change our culture, not theirs. It's an attack on Christianity.

It's why our Justice department stands down and why Muslims are being appointed to public office. If we don't fix this, they will be trying to force their satanic religious laws on us.

Kimber's avatar

Mayor Frey should be forced to address the mutilation issue by the press in a public press conference, including who is doing the surgeries, and which “religion” is responsible.

Multipolonius's avatar

This Third World degenerate barbarism, and mutilation should never be a lawful practice anywhere in the United States. It is because of the 1965 Hart-Celler immigration act , and open borders , that we are now wearing the shameful blot of allowing the mutilation of women inside of our country ….and not doing anything to the mutilators!!!

Kat811's avatar

The evil needs to be acknowledged as happening before something can be done about it. It makes people squeamish so they'd rather just turn the page or click on a new topic. Oh, and this is also one of the practices of Muslims, don't forget that. They basically view women as an evil needing to be covered up and suppressed.

Kathy Christian's avatar

That's because they view women as inherently bad because of Eve offering the fruit to Adam. What they leave out is that Adam willingly ate the fruit, too

Donna's avatar

Eve was deceived into eating of the forbidden fruit. Adam knew what he was doing and willfully transgressed, which brought the curse of death onto mankind.

Part of the sinful nature we all have is to deny our wrong doing or blame someone else for it.

There is historical evidence that Rome created Islam to gain back Jerusalem from the people of Ishmael, but it backfired obviously.

Jen's avatar

Everyone knows this is happening but no one has the balls to do anything about it. We still have honor killings in the US as disgusting as this all his, and has been for years, I seriously doubt any law enforcement will get involved with this “religious rights” bullshit.

😡😡😡

Kathy Christian's avatar

It's better to let women and young girls be sexually mutilated or murdered than to be called a racist. That's the long and the short of it, people. And until men in this country grow some balls, the sexual mutilators and child abuse-abetting elected representatives that allow them will destroy this country.

M W's avatar
Dec 4Edited

Think the unConstitutional determination is the proper decision. The authority of the federal government is supposed to be limited to those powers in the Constitution. I realize the federal government rarely limits itself to those constraints.

Banking is a power of the federal government. Likely under the interstate commerce clause - it crosses state lines. Federal laws over things tangentially related to it would be considered appropriate for the federal government to regulate. It’s why a primary responsibility of the FBI was kidnapping where the victim was taken out of state - invoking the interstate commerce clause.

During the Civil Rights era, the interstate commerce clause was broadly interpreted and applied to allow the federal government to have its segregation and discrimination laws upheld and applied. The states didn’t want them.

Here are a couple of cases and the facts used to say that interstate commerce applied.

A restaurant discriminated against Black people. It was located a few miles from the state line. It had customers from the other state. Interstate commerce clause applied.

A restaurant was far from the state line. It bought ingredients from a supplier in another state. Those ingredients traveled across state lines. The interstate commerce clause applied.

The first case that went against this trend was a federal law prohibiting guns within a distance of schools. The federal government argued that the gun traveled in interstate commerce and therefore, the federal government had Constitutional authority. SCOTUS finally had enough.

And all laws regulate behavior. They either force you to do something or prohibit you from doing something.

States should absolutely pass laws that prohibit such harmful activity.

RegretLeft's avatar

"Investigate" ?! - At this point, I am almost ready to settle for someone (other than JR) merely MENTIONING it! (i.e someone with national visibility - there may well be some brave local people standing up for Somali/American girls ... while the mayor goes on about how much they "love" the Somali community.) (Naomi Wolf may have done that - I don't recall when or where).

robert adkins's avatar

John, You are very correct about this. But I think you'll need to post this article at least once a week to get the attention of someone willing to take it on. Mike LIndell is now running for governor of Minnesota now, maybe he is one willing to announce it.

I'm totally with you this is a subject/practice that needs to be publicized. Here's the pitiful thing...the feminists know about it but won't take it up.

curt s sanders's avatar

Astounding! Wow! if we have to deploy the fifth Marines in Minnesota.. this barbaric madness has got to stop.. and every single Somali male or female that believes that this cultural tradition is good to go in America.. has got to be shipped out... ASAP and I do mean ASAP.. they are not allowed to take a daughter who is six years old or younger.. And that judge and that doctor should be indicted... beyond incredible...!

mo's avatar

This stirs within me a reflexive bile-churning repugnance so strong that it nears the same level of evil as child trafficking.

Men were designed by our Creator to defend and protect. But most "males" have become castrated by a combination of social constraints and exposure to environmental toxins that have striped away this instinct and keep them sedated and weak, morally and physically.

I am praying for vigilante justice brought by those who would rather die, if necessary, than allow this to continue.

Christy Stadelmaier's avatar

Just a thought…is it possible TPTB, almost all male, are simply choosing to ignore this horrifying practice? Are they thinking…’they did it to us at birth, what’s the difference?’

But then again, cutting off perfectly functioning body parts, some even at taxpayer expense is AOK with TPTB. Just a guess here, these are all topics the benighted rulers would rather not think about at all. They allow those with their own agendas, no matter how insane, to rule the day.

Jennifer Heaven's avatar

How repulsed? Absolutely. In the UK it is illegal and can be reported.https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMw_0c069b2a-ecd1-4f18-a918-9040e9162d0f

IvanB's avatar

"Stunning and brave" politicians, isn't it time to stand up?????? Where are you all????

Sunseeker's avatar

While horrific, an investigation that spotlights immigrant FGM in a country where the genitals of US boys and girls are specimens for an expert class of gender docs is near impossible to dismantle with a straight face. I believe there are 12 now transgender shield/ sanctuary states (plus DC).The sanctuary states for immigration number 17 or so with significant overlap. US culture has been inching away from Christianity for a long time now. While the fight against wrong sex child drugs and surgeries in red states gains traction, the blue states double down. Age 18 young adults are fair game for the gender docs at the growing number of US businesses that will affirm and refer for surgical "enhancements."

Susan Ryan's avatar

Why bother? MIchigan beat them to the Shariah Punch ("freedom of religion" perversion): https://www.newsweek.com/jumana-nagarwala-female-genital-mutilation-detroit-585799

From AI Google: The religious justifications cited for the FGM procedures in the case of Dr. Jumana Nagarwala centered on claims that the practice—known as khatna within the Dawoodi Bohra sect—is a religious obligation. Defense arguments asserted that the procedure was a form of religious preservation of honor for women, referencing Islamic texts. Specifically, proponents cited a hadith in which the Prophet Muhammad reportedly said, “Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women,” and another stating, “Do not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a husband.” Dr. Nagarwala and her legal team maintained that the act—described as removing a small piece of skin—was a religious ritual protected under the First Amendment, not an act of mutilation, and was consistent with obligations in her Dawoodi Bohra Muslim faith.