We’re seeing a budding trend. Defamation suits...
Hear, hear. So far, he's lost at least one subscriber, and I'm a retired attorney! One of the earliest statements I heard him say years back was that his stance with the resisters would cost him an eventual Nobel prize for the mRNA technology. Thought that was an odd sentiment, but his Napoleonic streak has become clearer. He needs to get better advice from a better lawyer before his image is reduced to a bully, while the Breggins are hailed as martyrs.
Interesting you mention Malone. He now travels like a circus monkey; on the circuit of doctors who are outspoken about the harms that Malone's mRNA 'jab' did/does. There's something not right about the guy. I pick up on the lack of sincerity or something. Apparently, he is v*x injured now...
Thank you for bringing sanity and levity to a sad situation. You are like Christopher Hitchens -- completely irreplaceable.
Dr. Malone's actions are incomprehensible, if his interest is advancing the idea of individual liberty in a sane society. Public figures are open to criticism in a free society. Dr. Breggin and his wife are free to express their opinions and so is Dr. Malone, about their opinions. As you indicate, one's work speaks for itself.
Dr. Breggin is 86 years old and has worked for several decades to try to contribute to the health and safety of medical consumers. I wonder what Dr. Malone's work during the last few decades has contributed to?
Maybe Dr. Tom Cowan needs to sue Jeremy Hammond who has accused him of purposefully lying and of being a danger to the health freedom movement?
Dr. Cowan is not interested is suing. He is busy trying to remind us of what science is supposed to be aiming to do.
Look into Malone's background. He plays for the other team.
Excellent advice. Really. I hope he sees this piece and takes what you’ve said to heart.
I am a big fan of Dr. Breggin. I have read several of his books. I have listened to many of his podcasts before and since the covid scam. I am not an expert of any kind -except about myself, and sometimes I doubt even that. I don't know what Dr. and Mrs. Breggin have opined about Malone, but they have every right to say what they think. I doubt, very seriously they said anything that isn't in a public record and then made their own thoughts on his record be known. If Dr. Malone can't take whatever was said about him by the Breggins he should be very careful because there are others who have given their opinions about his work that are very unflattering.
The Breggins must have seemed like easy picking to Malone's lawyers.
Thank you, Jon, for addressing this. I have followed Peter Breggin for years before COVID. As a mental health therapist, he brought honor back to my field, which has lost its way. Since covid, so many different perspectives on health, medicine, science, and even to the nature of our reality have come to light. Everyone comes to their opinions based on their past work; everyone offers something different. I find this extremely interesting and challenging to my own thinking processes. We have gotten only one side of things (the propaganda), for too long...thank god we have differing opinions now. For Malone to strike out against the Breggins like this speaks volumes about his character. Why doesn't he just debate him online for all to see? Let public opinion be the judge.
The world needs more folk like the Breggins right now. Taking them down hurts our fight for the truth. There is no winning for Malone now, no matter what the courts decide.
Thanks, Jon. I believe Malone knows what he is doing: Going after the ONE Psychiatrist who calls out Big Pharma on the Mental Disease Hoax. Peter has done that for decades and this was seen as a huge opportunity to sidetrack/silence Peter.
PS - He has a small team that writes his substacks.
Very well said, as always. Personally, I stopped paying attention to Malone a long time ago. I just don’t trust him. What he is doing to the Breggins is nothing more than a nuclear-level temper tantrum. Since when did it become impossible for medical professionals to have rational conversations, individual opinions, and “agree to disagree” about issues? Just because someone disagrees with your views about a subject doesn’t give you the right to try to destroy them. It’s incredibly cruel, among other things.
Excellent job, Jon. And I had a couple of big belly laughs today from it.
Fun aside, I had an instant dislike for Malone from the beginning. His well-trimmed beard, grandfatherly persona and articulate soft-spoken voice, I smelled a foul smell from the beginning and I was admonished over and over for saying he was a shill.
He always beLIEved in the virus myth and that was part of his job, to claim he was a developer in the mRNA technology, for the purposes of credibility as a (political) “scientist” and “authority” figure and then to do an about face to support the anti jab crowd. Smoke comes out of my ears just thinking about this crook.
Dr. Peter Breggin has proven himself to be a genuine, caring human being who has exposed appalling treatment of people and who wanted to change that. I see no malice or manipulation from Dr. Breggin.
I see Malone as a poisonous snake who is now poised to strike at free speech, and that obviously includes revealing truth. “Do not challenge the AUTHORITY of the medical cartel nor the power structure (that funds me)”. He represents the power structure’s attempt to silence any opposition to the facts which prove malice and malfeasance.
I just read the Breggins take on this, I am confused, this is a defamation lawsuit based on a disagreement of the use of mass formation psychosis? Is there anything else going on? Did the Breggins state unequivocally that Malone fucks goats or something? I just don't see how this doesn't get tossed out immediately.
John, this post is the best you have written, since I subscribed. It contains all the philosophical points that you make concerning a variety of topics. Well done.
Malone is an actor, and not a very good one at that. He needs to be outed and booted from the "opposition."
I hope he listens to you. But, I doubt it.