Woodward is an establishment mouthpiece. He's controlled opposition and has been for decades. I think this is perhaps one of the most difficult aspects of the New World Order establishment for people to grasp... that it runs somewhat sophisticated controlled opposition... in media... in politics... even in pop culture.
Yes. A LOT of people have difficulty discerning the controlled opposition for what it really is. Not to say that I'm entirely successful at it! Hell, I didn't really understand it myself until about a year ago. Such folks (and so did I) so want to believe that people are black-and-white, either good or bad - but they're not. There are limitless stretches of gray.
But, controlled opposition is not limited to the NWO - we see it every day in the so-called "Republicans" (RINOs) and even "Democrats"... Many Trump supporters desperately cling to this ideology, and when you bring up even one reason (let alone the fact that there are numerous reasons) to doubt him and his intents, they go ballistic. Reason is entirely blinded by emotions.
That quote, often attributed to CIA director William Casey, comes to mind more & more these days - "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Love your switching positions up - shows Woodward for the sell-out and shill that he is, or, at least has become. For him to think himself a "real" journalist and Assange not - just underlines the point.
I recommend everyone here go back and watch the film The Post to understand how Hollywood works together with the media to totally fool the gullible dumb down public.
I saw it 2-3 years ago and remember that it tells the story of what we were told happened in the battle between the Post and the Times to be the first to tell the story of the Pentagon Papers and how Daniel Ellsberg dug up the dirt. I'm fairly certain that there is much the film isn't saying since everything from MSM is always tainted. But maybe less so back then than now. I wonder how Watergate would be reported today especially if it was a Democratic Party foul play.
Woodward is an establishment mouthpiece. He's controlled opposition and has been for decades. I think this is perhaps one of the most difficult aspects of the New World Order establishment for people to grasp... that it runs somewhat sophisticated controlled opposition... in media... in politics... even in pop culture.
Yes. A LOT of people have difficulty discerning the controlled opposition for what it really is. Not to say that I'm entirely successful at it! Hell, I didn't really understand it myself until about a year ago. Such folks (and so did I) so want to believe that people are black-and-white, either good or bad - but they're not. There are limitless stretches of gray.
But, controlled opposition is not limited to the NWO - we see it every day in the so-called "Republicans" (RINOs) and even "Democrats"... Many Trump supporters desperately cling to this ideology, and when you bring up even one reason (let alone the fact that there are numerous reasons) to doubt him and his intents, they go ballistic. Reason is entirely blinded by emotions.
That quote, often attributed to CIA director William Casey, comes to mind more & more these days - "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false."
Love your switching positions up - shows Woodward for the sell-out and shill that he is, or, at least has become. For him to think himself a "real" journalist and Assange not - just underlines the point.
I recommend everyone here go back and watch the film The Post to understand how Hollywood works together with the media to totally fool the gullible dumb down public.
I saw it 2-3 years ago and remember that it tells the story of what we were told happened in the battle between the Post and the Times to be the first to tell the story of the Pentagon Papers and how Daniel Ellsberg dug up the dirt. I'm fairly certain that there is much the film isn't saying since everything from MSM is always tainted. But maybe less so back then than now. I wonder how Watergate would be reported today especially if it was a Democratic Party foul play.
Another fine example!
There is no justice
There is just us.