Smooooth Jon. A guy who got duped by Pfizer and the CDC until mid 2021 waves his money around like a self righteous buffoon, and millions flock to him like he's a plandemic information messiah.
Bravo! Loved it!! Short, to the point, deadly accurate portrayal of how the illogical man with $$$ proposes to re-define scientific proof. “Let’s talk about it then take a vote. QED”
When someone pushes and their is no resistance that someone falls on his face. When one resists it lends credence. Speaking of money I hope that everyone has heard about dr Paul Alexander’s refusal of a million bucks and 50 grand a year forever more from Pfizer and only to keep his opinions to himself I wonder if anyone else has been offered such a bribe????
Steve “Uberman” Kirsch , dwelling in his gold palace beside King Midas , has made many contributions publicizing the toxicity n fraud of this Covid “vaccine”. Having said that , it is surprising and quite a shame he fails to grasp the many flaws n unscientific assumptions about the lack of process in the isolation of this purported virus ! Sidenote: money doesn’t give credibility or proof for an argument….
Sarcasm is not argument. If you prefer words then use them. Kirsch near as I can tell has reasonable critique of your assertions (proof?) that the Covid virus does not exist. Addressing them and/or refuting them would be more credible than your straw man response to Kirsch. Respectfully, Man up?
Looking at this contention --- as to whether or not the coronavirus exists or not,... (start digression: and, by extension, what are those PCR Tests and HomeKit/Harmacy Tests actually detecting,... and then, say, coronavirus were to be proven to exist scientifically (some say it already has been proven to exist scientifically),... THEN, does IT then cause SOME, ALL, of the various multitudes of the various symptoms attributed to IT (from the mild, to the severe, to DEATH [skull&crossbones emoji]) -- that can't otherwise be explained by the given set of environmental factors present in/around each particular individual? /end digression) --- FROM a "Public Relations" perspective...
...is one of the main contentions that if "we (or, some of us, a noisy contingent within the rank-and-file)" start saying "the coronavirus doesn't exist", then the people that "we" are trying to reach with the very important, life-saving message "don't take the jab, it's poison" will not listen to "us", and will instead, take (or continue to take) the poisonous juice-jab because they think "the coronavirus doesn't exist" contingent are crazy people "so why should I listen to them"?
In other words, from a "Public Relations" perspective, for those in the Steve Kirsch camp, is it primarily "what can we do with our [crowd-sourced] messaging 'broadcasters' to save even more lives than we are already saving with our current messaging"?
And to achieve that end, the message needs to be laser-focused, and, there needs to be no dissension from within the ranks? Just focus on the "don't take the jab, it's poison. Here's why..."? message. "That we can save more lives doing it (the messaging) this way."
For your listening pleasure, if you're so inclined:
Podcast: Viruses That Don’t Exist; I’m covering all the bases in this podcast" (June 21, 2022)
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/new-podcast-viruses-that-dont-exist
"Podcast: [...] Plus: The Current Debate about the Existence of the 'COVID virus'" (August 2, 2022)
https://jonrappoport.substack.com/p/new-podcast-solving-the-tanking-economy
Great article as always Jon! This guy is driving us nuts. Talk about misusing a bully pulpit.
Meanwhile, thought you might enjoy this two minute video I made on the virus issue:
https://vimeo.com/743557094
Smooooth Jon. A guy who got duped by Pfizer and the CDC until mid 2021 waves his money around like a self righteous buffoon, and millions flock to him like he's a plandemic information messiah.
Kirsch is rapidly approaching Berenson level of grift. Is he still hawking fluvoxamine?
Bravo! Loved it!! Short, to the point, deadly accurate portrayal of how the illogical man with $$$ proposes to re-define scientific proof. “Let’s talk about it then take a vote. QED”
When someone pushes and their is no resistance that someone falls on his face. When one resists it lends credence. Speaking of money I hope that everyone has heard about dr Paul Alexander’s refusal of a million bucks and 50 grand a year forever more from Pfizer and only to keep his opinions to himself I wonder if anyone else has been offered such a bribe????
Steve “Uberman” Kirsch , dwelling in his gold palace beside King Midas , has made many contributions publicizing the toxicity n fraud of this Covid “vaccine”. Having said that , it is surprising and quite a shame he fails to grasp the many flaws n unscientific assumptions about the lack of process in the isolation of this purported virus ! Sidenote: money doesn’t give credibility or proof for an argument….
Awesome Jon. 🤩
Steve is one of many great people who are exposing the crimes of pharma using their own tools (statistics and knowledge regulatory procedures). However some of these people lack knowledge of basic scientific methods. Check out the first 14 minutes of this discussion: https://rumble.com/v1dcl8l-i-interview-virus-denier-patrick-gunnels-to-clarify-his-views.html
That's right.
Love it!!
Sarcasm is not argument. If you prefer words then use them. Kirsch near as I can tell has reasonable critique of your assertions (proof?) that the Covid virus does not exist. Addressing them and/or refuting them would be more credible than your straw man response to Kirsch. Respectfully, Man up?
Looking at this contention --- as to whether or not the coronavirus exists or not,... (start digression: and, by extension, what are those PCR Tests and HomeKit/Harmacy Tests actually detecting,... and then, say, coronavirus were to be proven to exist scientifically (some say it already has been proven to exist scientifically),... THEN, does IT then cause SOME, ALL, of the various multitudes of the various symptoms attributed to IT (from the mild, to the severe, to DEATH [skull&crossbones emoji]) -- that can't otherwise be explained by the given set of environmental factors present in/around each particular individual? /end digression) --- FROM a "Public Relations" perspective...
...is one of the main contentions that if "we (or, some of us, a noisy contingent within the rank-and-file)" start saying "the coronavirus doesn't exist", then the people that "we" are trying to reach with the very important, life-saving message "don't take the jab, it's poison" will not listen to "us", and will instead, take (or continue to take) the poisonous juice-jab because they think "the coronavirus doesn't exist" contingent are crazy people "so why should I listen to them"?
In other words, from a "Public Relations" perspective, for those in the Steve Kirsch camp, is it primarily "what can we do with our [crowd-sourced] messaging 'broadcasters' to save even more lives than we are already saving with our current messaging"?
And to achieve that end, the message needs to be laser-focused, and, there needs to be no dissension from within the ranks? Just focus on the "don't take the jab, it's poison. Here's why..."? message. "That we can save more lives doing it (the messaging) this way."